good form, bad form
Nov. 29th, 2002 11:05 pm"So, Pan," said Hook at last, "this is all your doing."
"Ay, James Hook," came the stern answer, "it is all my doing."
"Proud and insolent youth," said Hook, "prepare to meet thy doom."
"Dark and sinister man," Peter answered, "have at thee."
---
"Ay, James Hook," came the stern answer, "it is all my doing."
"Proud and insolent youth," said Hook, "prepare to meet thy doom."
"Dark and sinister man," Peter answered, "have at thee."
---
...his shoes were right, and his waistcoat was right, and his tie was right...
Date: 2002-11-29 03:50 pm (UTC)"Consequently, to maintain our charge we have to disappropriate Peter, that is to break/split the "good form" in a properly Deleuzean manner by inscribing "difference in the very heart of the differentializing differential itself" (1968: 154). Fortunately for us, this disappropriating inscription happens to be the outcome of the Oedipal rivalry in Barrie's novel."
-mjj
Re: ...his shoes were right, and his waistcoat was right, and his tie was right...
Date: 2002-11-30 02:16 pm (UTC)