incandescens: (Default)
[personal profile] incandescens
Looking at some of the discussion of Hero I've seen around the place (and may I just say that I would like to heap coals of fire on the heads of everyone who's already seen it, YOU LUCKY SO AND SOS) it seems to bring up a question which has been raised before, from what one might term the other side.

How much is it permissible to alter the substance, characters, background, history, or other details of a storyline for a film, in order to conform with the current taste and theories?

Is it right to portray as a virtue things which were regarded as virtuous/upright/proper/natural at the time of the original story which is being filmed? Should one do anything else?

How much of a story should be changed to agree with the taste of the public, or the nationality of the filmmakers (Braveheart, Enigma, King Arthur, other stuff)?

No, I don't have any answers.

---

The Tower walls at midnight burn,
With fraught desire -- the rocks beneath
Are taut and wet with fiction's blood.
Someone leaps. The other turns. But who is who.
(and who are you?)

[...]

-- Close to the River, Anno
(deleted comment)
(deleted comment)

Date: 2004-09-01 01:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shiny-monkey.livejournal.com
I think it's less that nobody cares but that what can you do? Rail against the wind, I suppose, but Hollywood will do what Hollywood will do and screw the few who might object.

Date: 2004-08-31 01:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bruceb.livejournal.com
As usual at times like this, I quote the opening of Clive Barker's Weaveworld, because I believe it to be entirely appropriate:

"Nothing ever begins. There is no first moment; no single word or phrase from which this or any other story springs. The threads can always be traced back to some earlier tale, and to the tales that preceded that; though as the narrator's voice recedes the connections will seem to grow more tenuous, for each age will want the tale told as if it were of its own making. Thus the pagan will be sanctified, the tragic become laughable; great lovers will stoop to sentiment, and demons dwindle to clockwork toys.

"Nothing is fixed. In and out the shuttle goes, fact and fiction, mind and matter woven into patterns that may have only this in common: that hidden among them is a filigree that will with time become a world. It must be arbitrary, then, the place of which we choose to embark, somewhere between a past half forgotten and a future as yet only glimpsed."

Date: 2004-08-31 08:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] copperbird.livejournal.com
Is this a particular issue with Hero?

Date: 2004-08-31 10:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] copperbird.livejournal.com
I had noticed that rpg.net seems to have a proportion of very outspoken reactionary american types :)

For other reviews, try this: http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/hero/
(It's just a collection of links to online film reviews - most of these reviewers are from the US and collectively they adore it. Hmm. Which makes me think I want to see it, actually :) My research says 24th Sept for opening date... maybe a trip to London is in order ...)

To answer the question, I think the spin a director puts on a story is as valid and interesting as any other part on it. If these things have merit, it's because they can teach us something about ourselves and the society we live in. (I do think it's intellectually more honest to at least mention when RL history has been changed for artistic reasons, like in Enigma). We can look at Casablanca, Olivier's Henry V, and Leni Riefenstahl's films now and still see merit in them despite the overt messages. Maybe even because of them ... it maybe says more to us about our grandparent's lives and views than if they had told the stories 'straight'.

But I still won't watch Enigma :)

Date: 2004-08-31 10:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] diony.livejournal.com
But can there be a totally unbiased representation of the story? In translating to a visual medium things are going to change, and those changes are going to reflect the culture of the people doing the translation.

Date: 2004-08-31 02:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] petronia.livejournal.com
I think there is Maoist ideology there, which in the current sociopolitical context is rather interesting. (I was discussing this on a similar thread in [livejournal.com profile] corneredangel's blog, which I'll link in order not to type it out again XD: http://www.livejournal.com/users/corneredangel/501710.html)

Date: 2004-08-31 03:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] baileyflower.livejournal.com
I think it's worth noting that rpg.net is pretty much my benchmark for defining internet cesspools, and I haven't gone there for over a month (was Flower of December while i was there).

Date: 2004-09-01 02:22 pm (UTC)
ext_7549: (Sod this! (made by crying_star@LJ))
From: [identity profile] solaas.livejournal.com
*facepalm* Sometimes a big piece of cloth in a bright, vibrant colour is just a big piece of cloth in a bright, vibrant colour. It's PRETTY! Implied and/or percieved ideologies can go hang.

[/philistine] ;D

Profile

incandescens: (Default)
incandescens

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 14th, 2026 07:36 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios